Film Fridays – George Miller’s production company and Warner Bros continue to engage in heated legal battle over ‘Mad Max’ franchise

The future of George Miller’s “Mad Max” franchise is in jeopardy as a court battle between the director’s production company, Kennedy Miller Mitchell, and Warner Bros. heats up in Australia’s Supreme Court of New South Wales. Miller’s company is suing the studio for unpaid earnings on “Mad Max: Fury Road.” The director spoke briefly about the lawsuit last November, but The Sydney Morning Herald has obtained new court documents that detail the battle between the two companies.

The lawsuit accuses Warner Bros. of acting in a “high-handed, insulting or reprehensible” manner and “destroying” its relationship with Kennedy Miller Mitchell by refusing to pay the production company a bonus fee for delivering the movie under budget. Kennedy Miller Mitchell claims it is eligible for $9 million after it delivered “Fury Road” under the agreed budget of $157 million. The production company says “Fury Road’s” final budget was $154.6 million, although Warner Bros. claims the film went way over budget and cost $185.1 million.

In a cross-lawsuit filed by Warner Bros., the studio accuses Kennedy Miller Mitchell of breaking contract over the film’s intended runtime and rating. Warner Bros. says Miller’s production company signed a contract to deliver a 100-minute movie with a PG-13 rating. “Fury Road” ended up running 120 minutes and earned an R rating from the MPAA.

The lawsuit also mentions conflict between Kennedy Miller Mitchell and Warner Bros. over which scenes would be shot for the movie. The production company alleges Warner Bros. insisted Miller not shoot some of the scenes he had scripted, including those set in Immortan Joe’s Citadel. Kennedy Miller Mitchell accuses the studio of making a series of decisions that caused “substantial changes and delays” to the production, including cutting scenes and forcing re-shoots after seeing Miller’s rough cut.

“Fury’s Road” reshoots are another point of contention between the studio and the production company. Kennedy Miller Mitchell says Warner Bros. approved a $31 million plan to reshoot scenes for the movie and that the cost was to be excluded from the net cost of the movie. However, Warner Bros. says the company agreed to fund some of the additional filming and that it made changes without the studio’s approval that delayed production and raised the budget.

Another source of debate between the companies is the involvement of Brett Ratner’s Ratpac-Dune Entertainment. Kennedy Miller Mitchell claims Warner Bros. arranged for Ratpac-Dune to co-finance the movie despite being contractually required to offer the company the first opportunity to do so if it was required.

– Excerpt from an article written by Zach Sharf for Indie Wire. Find the full article here

—————————————————————————————————————————–

Disclaimer: Please note that the information contained within this news post and site is offered simply as a consideration to visitors who are in the entertainment industry and are seeking to learn more about various areas of entertainment, be it in film, movies, television, music, digital, new media, film financing, merchandising and/or branding. As such, the information so provided should never be construed as legal advice. If you need further assistance or legal advice for your specific matter, please do not hesitate in contacting an entertainment attorney (film, music, digital, licensing, financing) here in Los Angeles, California at The Hollywood Lawyer by(1) emailing us at info@hollywoodlawyer.com; (2) calling us at (323) 300-4184; or (3) filling out our online form. www.thehollywoodlawyer.com

About thehollywoodlawyer (423 Articles)
At The Hollywood Lawyer in Los Angeles, our entertainment attorneys are committed to assisting all talent (actors, artists, singers, writers, dancers, directors, producers, directors, editors, engineers, executives), entertainment companies (film studios, recording facilities, record labels, management companies, agencies, publishing companies, film studios, distributors), start-ups, small businesses,filmmakers, music makers and social entrepreneurs,with all of their personal, career, business and/or charity law needs be it talent representation or accompaniment through a deal or negotiations.
%d bloggers like this: